| |
They should call this "When TNA was good"
Posted By: Guest#9071 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 04:44 AM
|
|
| |
tna tna tna
Posted By: mclovin (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 06:03 AM
|
|
| |
and someone is probably going to disagree and make fun of me. That's all that happens on this site anyway.
Posted By: John (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 06:54 AM
|
|
| |
great match.. ****+
AJ in 2005 was almost as good as HBK in 1996 (in ring wise)
Posted By: fred (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 09:32 AM
|
|
| |
I thought Sacrifice was after Lockdown?
Posted By: Guest#0299 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 11:37 AM
|
|
| |
****1/2
Posted By: Guest#5014 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 12:11 PM
|
|
| |
I really don't mean for this to sound like complaining, but did TNA buy a share in 411 or something? What's with all the TNA videos lately? I'm quite capable of using YouTube myself, thanks.
2005 TNA makes me happy, though.
Posted By: Steve307 (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 11:35 PM
|
|
| |
and someone is probably going to disagree and make fun of me. That's all that happens on this site anyway.
Posted By: John (Guest) on July 03, 2009 at 06:54 AM
My, you have a very high opinion of yourself!
How many times have come back to this page to see if someone has commented back??
Posted By: This is what you do? (Guest) on July 05, 2009 at 02:58 PM
|
|
|
|